Anonymous asked: So my partner and I run satellite hardening and I'm working on blocking out answers to the "SSA requires a definite course of action" T. I have a pretty good counter interp but I'm a little stuck on the direction I should take in answering the voters. It's kind of like I-spec in that it focuses on implementation. Any suggestions on answering it? Thanks :D
1. Fairness is non-unique. It’s the negative’s burden to prove there is some sort of neutral objectivity to what constitutes “fair” in debate. (Hint: there isn’t)
2. The more education, the better. By limiting what you can and can’t run they limit the amount of education that the topic which is pretty shitty. Read some Bleiker cards about the regulation of language which I’m pretty sure is in every single framework file ever cut.
3. Reasonability is the best way to evaluate topicality. It’s not like you’re doing a puppet show to polka music. You’re presenting a plan that endorses USFG action which is more topical than 88% of the affirmatives out there.
